
Been a fan of CoTweet as a Twitter client for some time, but with it’s recent demise, I’ve been looking around. If I’m going to change though, I want a significant step forward…. found it! Alternion was in private beta for 6 months last year, launching into public beta in November 2011.
Initially, it’s a social feed aggregator. There’s plenty enough of those around, but this one wins for me on two fronts. First the interface is clean, effective, easy to use and second, the sheer number of services you can integrate kills anything else I’ve seen. Sure, HootSuite or TweetDeck will take care of LinkedIn, Facebook and Twitter in one place – but this, if you so wish, will connect to over TWO HUNDRED different services. No-one I know uses that range, but most people I know have one or two niche sites they like which won’t connect and aggregate easily. This may well win them over where the mainstream tools fail. There are too many for a decent screen grab – so this shot just shows you those for the blog sites it’ll connect with. You get the idea….
One thing I would like is the ability to push out to more than the big three social networks mentioned here – but this is currently in line with other standards being set and will no doubt develop further in time. I also note that despite the proliferation of photo sites, music sites, blogging, social networking… there’s no support for GooglePlus yet. I’d imagine that’ll be added pretty soon though. By the way, that photo aspect?
Moving on from Social, Alternion also allows you to integrate email accounts – support is right there for GMail and other internet account, plus full support for POP and IMAP accounts. You can view either combined or separate inboxs and undertake regular email tasks (though you lose some of the advanced functionality things like GMail offer).
There’s also a Contacts aggregator – so my LinkedIn, Twitter and Facebook connections, all grouped and searchable. Handy, if your networks are different on each platform and you can’t remember where you connected with Mr X. There seems to be a limit on the number imported, but again, I think this is a beta issue and will be resolved in the longer term. The social address book could well be the gem in this product for many users.
The ability to customise what’s displayed on your own profile, and import from those various other sites will no doubt appeal to some. Likewise, the ability to search / explore others users will certainly have some sourcers showing interest. The privacy and notification options seem accessible and simple too.
How quickly Alternion progresses past these earlier limitations, I don’t know. Certainly though, for a product just into public beta, it looks remarkably extensive in ambition and polished in presentation. What else does it need? Well, for me they’ve done a great job of the connectivity and they’ve nailed multi-account connections for Facebook and Twitter. I’m not yet seeing scheduling options though, or the ability for company accounts – seems a single-user product is the current aim. I’d like to use my own bit.ly account for link shortening too – read why here.
Regardless, I’ll be keeping close to this one!
Filed in Facebook, LinkedIn, Recruitment, Social Media, Social Recruiting, Twitter
Tags: CoTweet, cotweet alternative, facebook, GMail, hootsuite alternative, LinkedIn, News aggregator, social feed aggregator, social media dashboard, TweetDeck, tweetdeck alternative, Twitter
Blog: Don’t tell me what I can’t read – Twitter Censorship
January 27, 2012
Dammit. Enjoying my train ride this morning, alternating between Wired and my tweetstream, when I became aware of the latest Twitter change (thanks Wessel). In order to aid future global growth, Twitter is introducing the ability to block certain content on a country by country basis. On the official blog, Twitter uses the example of countries such as France and Germany blocking pro-nazi content to explain this position.
I’ve long been opposed to censorship, especially in Social Media. I’m an ardent supporter of free speech, my right to express my views and indeed your right to be offended and argue your position. Mark Twain nailed it in my opinion:
“Censorship is telling a man he can’t have a steak just because a baby can’t chew it”
As with all things Internet, there are hacks available. Any censored content will be flagged to the user – and you’re able to go tell Twitter you’re in another country (it simply picks up your country via IP identification), so you’ll still be able to get at that content (thanks TNW). Only problem there is that Twitter is accessed more and more via mobile – when I’m guessing that hack is substantially more difficult.
I’m moved to write this for a number of reasons. First off, as you can no doubt tell, it’s a subject I feel strongly about.
Secondly, and I think it’s a bad move for Twitter. I understand why they feel it’s necessary in order to continue expansion and to protect from legal threats in future, but this just feels wrong. It’s up there with Google’s search results giving you a personal version of the internet, as opposed to the actual best results. Transparency is losing.
Finally, Twitter was one of the key empowerment platforms of the Arab Spring. Social Media didn’t cause that revolution – but there’s a strong case to say it supported.
This move suggests Twitter wants to win by supporting government wishes than by supporting the requirements of users.
A sad day indeed.
Filed in Personal, Social Media, Twitter
Tags: Arab Spring, Mark Twain, social media, Twitter, twitter blocking content, twitter censorship
Guest post: Social Media Policies: Promoting vs. Regulating Use
January 26, 2012
I occasionally offer up guest slots here. About 5 months ago, Kyle Lagunas wrote a piece I particularly enjoyed, so I’m delighted to welcome him back. More about him in the footer, but in the meantime, enjoy!
Fact: most employees occasionally use social media tools at work for personal reasons, anyway. Unsurprisingly, business leaders want guidelines in place for regulating employee use of social media outlets–and protecting against misuse–on personal and company accounts alike. Many 2012 corporate to-do lists include creating an official policy for regulating employees’ Tweets, Likes and Shares while at work.
One thing that I’ve noticed, though, is that while regulation-focused policies protect an organization against any potential social media blunders, they cast a shadow over the shoulder of every employee who uses the internet on a daily basis (shudder). Well-intended though they are, this approach to establishing guidelines often prevent the company from seeing any benefits whatsoever from employee use of social media. My suggestion: If your employees are already using social media while at work, why not make the most of it?
Though there’s certainly more than one way to skin this cat – there isn’t one universal social media policy that works for all, right? – there are a few things to consider when creating a more forward-thinking policy.
For example, you want to be sure you, your leaders, and your people know what you want to accomplish through social media. Are you using it for recruiting? Marketing? Branding? Promotions? For many organizations, the first step in creating a social media policy is to define the who, what, when and where of social media usage in the company. But according to Maren Hogan, Chief Marketing Brain of RedBranchMedia, “that’s doing it a little backwards.” With a clear purpose informing your policy, people will have an easier time understanding and following your guidelines.
On that note, you’re going to make sure that – regardless of your specific business goals – you are sure to invite everyone in the organization to participate. Of course, you’ll work with managers to decide which departments must incorporate social media into their daily workflows… But how can you encourage other departments to participate? One note: Set separate guidelines delineating voluntary users and mandatory users, so your people know what’s expected of them.
At some point, you’re going to need damage control. “When social media issues arise,” says Hogan, “who do you go to for help? IT? Marketing? A social media coordinator? The CIO?” Get proactive, and establish a hierarchy of ownership – that way, your people will know when to talk to whom about what. Assign responsibility to the most sensible parties and provide a course of action for addressing mishaps and escalating issues when necessary.
So maybe you’re not paying people to hang out on Facebook all day. Structure is certainly important, and defining who is authorized to access various platforms makes sense… but “Our brains don’t work with don’ts–they work in a positive way,” says Rob Garcia, VP of Product at UpMo. “Policies that limit and regulate are bound to be unsuccessful. They push people away from social media, rather than using it to achieve company goals.” Bottom line: People are bound to make mistakes, your policies should be driven by what to do, rather than what not do.
You’re bound to run into a few challenges when creating, implementing and supporting an official social media policy. Hands-down, the hardest part is building a company culture that embraces a social mindset, one driven by the sharing of ideas and information. With that in mind, leadership should lead the charge in adopting your social media policy, paving the way for the rest of the organization. Garcia’s straightforward advice to leaders: “Show up and participate. The companies that are the most social media savvy are led by people who are plugged in and using different platforms to have valuable conversations.”
About the Author: Kyle Lagunas is the HR Analyst at Software Advice. On the surface, it’s his job to contribute to the ongoing conversation on all things HR. Beyond that, he makes sure his audience is keeping up with important trends and hot topics in the industry. Focused on offering a fresh take on points of interest in his market, he’s not your typical HR guy.
Filed in Community, Guest post, Human Resources, Recruitment, Social Media, Social Recruiting
Tags: employment, Organizational culture, Policy, social media guidelines, social media policy
Blog: SOPA, website blackouts, the future of the internet
January 18, 2012
As you may have heard, many sites around the world today are blacked out. Not small, activist sites but sites like Wikipedia and Reddit. Google US has a tagline asking visitors to take action and has produced an infographic on the topic. This site remains live purely because I have enough technical knowledge to damage it beyond repair if I attempt a 24 hour blackout. I’m therefore using today not to talk about recruitment or social technology, but to share awareness of the topic.
Rather than give you my own partially formed analysis, I’ll give you this summary from VentureBeat (the full article includes more detail on the proposals and on the blackout campaign):
SOPA and PIPA would give the U.S. government and copyright holders the authority to seek court orders against foreign-operated websites associated with infringing, pirating or counterfeiting intellectual property. If it becomes law, it could drastically change the way the Internet operates. For example, if a website is accused of containing copyright-infringing content, the site could be blocked by ISPs, de-indexed from search engines and even prevented from doing business online with services like PayPal.
I’d also like to offer you this short video by way of further insight. Thanks to Stephen O’Donnell for this.
Filed in Social Media, Software Development, Start-ups, Video
Tags: PIPA, sopa, wikipedia blackout, reddit blackout, censorship, piracy


